[Mod_gzip] "mod_gzip_send_vary=Yes" disables caching on IE?
(1.3.26.1a)
Robert Collins
mod_gzip@lists.over.net
10 Dec 2002 08:41:58 +1100
--=-tmHzasgo2wJuUlCWjHck
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 03:44, TOKILEY@aol.com wrote:
> Thanks Rob.
>=20
> This is probably OT for the thread but as long as we are covering
> all these 'caching' issues let me ask you something.
>=20
> Are you saying that when SQUID receives a response that has
> "Expires: -1" in the response headers that it WILL, in fact,
> CACHE it?
>
> Doesn't "Expires: -1" always mean ALREADY EXPIRED
> and "no need to cache it"?
Any Expires date before 'now' means that the object is already stale.
See 14.21 in the RFC. Note that Expires: -1, Expires: 0, Expires: foobar
are all the same - they are invalid values and to be treated as some
arbitrary period in the past.
> Or have people just come to believe it stops 'caching' because
> it just 'looks' that way ( since document is being re-validated
> but it actually DID get written to SQUID's cache? )?
Ack.
Rob
--=-tmHzasgo2wJuUlCWjHck
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA99Q4lI5+kQ8LJcoIRAqvgAJ42/tC5VQIxd/h88WbEEdaCF9KZNACgoVMb
4GEfV14t46dwnsmggJtrHhU=
=Gqm/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-tmHzasgo2wJuUlCWjHck--