[Mod_gzip] "mod_gzip_send_vary=Yes" disables caching on IE? (1.3.26.1a)
mod_gzip@lists.over.net
mod_gzip@lists.over.net
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:20:05 EST
--part1_188.1247e476.2b267115_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 12/9/2002 3:50:36 PM Central Standard Time,
robertc@squid-cache.org writes:
> > Or have people just come to believe it stops 'caching' because
> > it just 'looks' that way ( since document is being re-validated
> > but it actually DID get written to SQUID's cache? )?
>
> Ack.
>
> Rob
>
Whoops... sorry... ignore last message.
At second glance... I take your simple 'Ack' response
response to my comment to mean that SQUID will,
in fact, write "Expires: -1" responses to disk even
though there is no need to.
If it's not the case. Ping back.
Thanks again...
Kevin
--part1_188.1247e476.2b267115_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 12/9/2002 3:50:36 PM Central Standard Time, robertc@squid-cache.org writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">> Or have people just come to believe it stops 'caching' because<BR>
> it just 'looks' that way ( since document is being re-validated<BR>
> but it actually DID get written to SQUID's cache? )?<BR>
<BR>
Ack.<BR>
<BR>
Rob<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Whoops... sorry... ignore last message.<BR>
<BR>
At second glance... I take your simple 'Ack' response<BR>
response to my comment to mean that SQUID will,<BR>
in fact, write "Expires: -1" responses to disk even<BR>
though there is no need to.<BR>
<BR>
If it's not the case. Ping back.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks again...<BR>
Kevin<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_188.1247e476.2b267115_boundary--