Antwort: [Mod_gzip] [ANNOUNCEMENT] mod_gzip 1.3.26.1a
Terry, Bill (MARC)
mod_gzip@lists.over.net
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0400
Then I should either stick with the old version for now or exclude Netscape
4 with User Agent. I think most corporations with proxy servers would use
only a few different browsers, so that should not be much of a problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Kruse [mailto:CK1@wwwtech.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:28 PM
To: mod_gzip@lists.over.net
Subject: Re: Antwort: [Mod_gzip] [ANNOUNCEMENT] mod_gzip 1.3.26.1a
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Terry, Bill (MARC) wrote:
> Using version 1.3.26.1a, is there any way to exclude Netscape 4 without
> disabling all caching?
Short and hard: no, there isn't.
> If I understand the documentation correctly
> (http://www.schroepl.net/projekte/mod_gzip/cache.htm), mod_gzip will send
a
> Vary: * header if I specify "mod_gzip_min_http 1001".
Yes, you understood correctly.
> The Vary * header will have the effect of disabling all (proxy) caching.
Yes.
But this is really mandatory. If you set 'mod_gzip_min_http 1001' the
variant of the request depends on a condition you can not express with
HTTP. Therefore the 'Vary: *' is send.
> And, if I use "mod_gzip_item_exclude reqheader 'User-agent:
> Mozilla/4.0[678]'", mod_gzip will include the user agent in the Vary
header.
Right. Again, this is mandatory.
> This will also disable caching.
Not disable. It will make it hard to cache the request and the proxy has
to save lots of variants, but it should not disable it.
Greetings,
CK
_______________________________________________
mod_gzip mailing list
mod_gzip@lists.over.net
http://lists.over.net/mailman/listinfo/mod_gzip